MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Exercise Improves Muscle Function In Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Patients Independent Of Changes In Pathophysiology

2021· article· en· W3180810003 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew I. Mikhail, Y. Emily, Katherine Manta, Alexander Manta, Sean Y. Ng, Joshua P. Nederveen, Vladimir Ljubicic, Mark A. Tarnopolsky

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyotonic dystrophyCardiorespiratory fitnessInternal medicineCardiologyMedicineEndocrinologyMyotoniaExercise intolerancePathophysiologyMuscle biopsyAtrophyMuscle atrophyPhysical therapyBiopsyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the leading life-limiting muscular dystrophy in adults. DM1 present with accelerated muscle atrophy, myotonia, cardiac arrhythmias and respiratory dysfunction. Primary hypothesis for DM1 manifestation is the abnormal localization and expression of several RNA binding proteins due to a ‘CTG’ DNA repeat expansion in the Dystrophia Myotonic Protein Kinase (DMPK) gene. Notably, the DM1 mutation results in the loss- and toxic gain of function mechanism in the muscleblind-like protein family (MBNL) and CUG-binding protein 1, respectively. Aerobic exercise has been deemed safe in DM1 patients, however, its efficacy on muscle function and DM1 pathophysiology in patients has yet to be elucidated. PURPOSE: To examine the benefits of 12-weeks of cycle ergometry on muscle function and cellular mechanisms in DM1 patients. METHODS: 11 DM1 patients (DM1, 42.6 ± 3 y) were recruited from the Neuromuscular Clinic at McMaster University Medical Centre along with age matched to healthy controls (CON, 42.5 ± 2 y). DM1 and CON performed VO2max testing, muscle functional tests and muscle biopsy from the vastus lateralis. Following the intervention (3x/wk @ ~65% VO2max), DM1 completed post testing. RESULTS: Cycle ergometry improved cardiorespiratory fitness by ~30% in DM1 (p < 0.05). Additionally, total lean mass and fiber area were increased following exercise (p < 0.05). Increases in muscle mass translated to improvements in physical function as measured by 6-min walk test, 5x sit to stand test, and timed up-and-go test (p < 0.05). Mitochondrial respiration and protein content were lower in DM1 relative to CON but were augmented following exercise (p < 0.05). Subcellular fractionation of revealed an increase in cytosolic content of MBNL2 while in situ fluorescence hybridization revealed no changes in MBNL1 sequestration in response to exercise in DM1 as measured by MBNL1/CUG)n positive myonuclei (p > 0.05). However, there was a reduction in the in average number of foci within myonuclei (p = 0.06) CONCLUSION: Exercise is a low-cost effective intervention to mitigate muscle atrophy in DM1 patients. Furthermore, training can augment mitochondrial function preventing muscle loss. Lastly, exercise benefits in DM1 patients appear to occur independent of changes in DM1 pathophysiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→