Accreditation Requirements and the Global History of Architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Other| June 01 2021 Accreditation Requirements and the Global History of Architecture Kathleen James-Chakraborty Kathleen James-Chakraborty University College Dublin Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2021) 80 (2): 136–139. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2021.80.2.136 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Kathleen James-Chakraborty; Accreditation Requirements and the Global History of Architecture. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 June 2021; 80 (2): 136–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2021.80.2.136 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search Much has changed in our discipline in the last quarter century. In 1995, when the Society of Architectural Historians last held its annual conference in Seattle, a much higher proportion of its members had been trained and subsequently taught in art history departments than is the case today, when more have backgrounds in architecture and teach in schools of architecture. Another obvious shift can be seen in the locations of the architecture we study. Of the 183 papers originally scheduled to be presented at the SAH 2020 conference in Seattle, roughly a quarter focused on the architecture of the Caribbean, Latin America, Africa, Asia, and even Antarctica. That count does not include any of the papers that addressed the architecture of ethnic minorities both in Europe and in the English-speaking world, or that focused on the teaching of architectural history. Of the 111 papers listed in the program for the... You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".