MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180940316 · doi:10.1002/pmrj.12677

Developing a decision aid for youth with brachial plexus birth injuries facing treatment decisions for an elbow flexion contracture

2021· article· en· W3180940316 on OpenAlexaff
Emily S. Ho, Janet Parsons, Kristen M. Davidge, Howard M. Clarke, Margaret L. Lawson, F. Virginia Wright

Bibliographic record

VenuePM&R · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalOttawa HospitalSt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBrachial plexusPsychosocialContext (archaeology)Brachial plexus injuryRehabilitationContracturePhysical therapyQualitative researchPsychological interventionNursingFamily medicineSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: A common sequela of brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is an elbow flexion contracture. Youth with BPBI and their families face rehabilitation or surgical decisions that ideally entail careful deliberation of the risks and benefits of treatment within the context of the child's and family's functional and appearance-related goals. OBJECTIVE: To develop a patient decision aid (PtDA) following International Patient Decision Aid Standards to help these youth and their families make treatment decisions. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study. SETTING: Brachial plexus clinic in a pediatric tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Five young adults (21-24 years), 14 youth (8-19 years) and their parents, 15 families (children 2-16 years), and 19 clinicians from a brachial plexus clinic participated in the PtDA development. Seventeen other youth (8-18 years) facing treatment decisions regarding their elbow contracture field tested the PtDA prototype. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-depth interviews and participant observation to conduct a decisional needs assessment of young adults, youth, parents, and health care professionals involved in these shared decisions. Cognitive interviews to field test the PtDA prototype. RESULTS: Evidence from previously conducted knowledge synthesis and the youth-focused decisional needs assessment qualitative data informed the development of new PtDA prototype, which included a questionnaire-based values clarification method for youth to rate what matters most to them regarding their elbow function, appearance, psychosocial impact, and treatment options. The majority (90%) of youth >11 years who field tested the PtDA prototype understood its content, whereas only 29% of those between 8 and 11 years demonstrated independent comprehension. The majority (69%) responded that they would prefer to use the PtDA on their own either at home or in the clinic waiting room. CONCLUSIONS: This new PtDA can be used to help youth with BPBI and their families to make a personal value-based informed decision regarding treatment options for their elbow flexion contracture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePM&RSame topicNerve Injury and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207