MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180964253

Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: understanding tumour tropism to maximise benefit from surgery.

2021· article· en· W3180964253 on OpenAlexaff
Melissa Frizziero, Akul Purohit, Abdullah Malik, Rahul Deshpande, Mairéad G. McNamara, Thomas Satyadas, Saurabh Jamdar, Rille Pihlak, Aali J. Sheen, Ajith K. Siriwardena, Richard Hubner, Derek O’Reilly, Juan W. Valle, Nicola de Liguori-Carino, Ángela Lamarca

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsLMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaTropismMedicineAdenocarcinomaHematologyPancreatic cancerPancreatic carcinomaInternal medicineOncologyGeneral surgeryPathologySurgeryCancerImmunologyVirus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Relapse-rate in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains high. Identification of modifiable factors associated with relapse could improve patient selection for surgery. Methods All consecutive patients diagnosed with PDAC undergoing curative surgery between Jan’05 and Sep’17 were retrospectively analysed. Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS)/Overall Survival (OS) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and survival analysis performed with univariate/multivariable Cox-regression (Cox). Logistic-regression (LR) was used for identification of risk factors of tumour recurrence. Results One-hundred-eighty-two patients eligible: microscopically involved resection-margins (R1) 65.7%; adjuvant chemotherapy (adj) 62.1%; 78.6% relapsed. Median (months) RFS and OS were 11.4 (95%CI=9.4-13.7) and 21.6 (95%CI=17.9-18.9), respectivelly. Relapse patterns identified included: “local-only” 30.1%, “distant-only” 40.5%, “combined” 29.4%; overall, distant metastases were identified in 69.9% of patients; distant metastases were located mainly in the liver (41.3%) with a median time-to-liver recurrence of 6.64 months (95%CI 4.99-8.56)). Factors impacting on risk of relapse were: R1 [(any-pattern) (LR-multivariable: OR=4.02; 95%CI=0.02-0.23)], pre-adj CA19.9>normal limit (NL) [(‘local-only’) (LR-univariate: OR=0.23; 95%CI=0.08-0.62)] and adj [(‘combined’) (LR-univariate: OR=0.46; 95%CI=0.22-0.96)]. R1 associated with shorter OS (Cox-multivariable: OR=1.90; 95%CI=1.13-3.19) while pre-adj CA19.9>LN implied shorter RFS (Cox-multivariable: OR=2.28; 95%CI=1.38-3.76) and OS (Cox-multivariable: OR=1.84; 95%CI=1.08-3.14). Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) liver was associated with a lower risk of relapse [(any pattern) (LR-multivariable: OR=0.06; 95%CI=0.02-0.23)] and was prognostic for longer OS (LR-multivariable: OR=0.27; 95%CI=0.09-0.74). Conclusion Majority of resected-PDAC patients will recur with distant metastases (liver); integrating preoperative MRI liver to patients’ pathway may improve patient selection and maximise benefit from surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)Same topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207