The complete mitogenome assemblies of 10 diploid potato clones reveal recombination and overlapping variants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potato mitogenome is complex and to understand various biological functions and nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions, it is important to characterize its gene content and structure. In this study, the complete mitogenome sequences of nine diploid potato clones along with a diploid Solanum okadae clone were characterized. Each mitogenome was assembled and annotated from Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) long reads and 10X genomics short reads. The results show that each mitogenome consists of multiple circular molecules with similar structure and gene organization, though two groups (clones 07506-01, DW84-1457, 08675-21 and H412-1 in one group, and clones W5281-2, 12625-02, 12120-03 and 11379-03 in another group) could be distinguished, and two mitogenomes (clone 10908-06 and OKA15) were not consistent with those or with each other. Significant differences in the repeat structure of the 10 mitogenomes were found, as was recombination events leading to multiple sub-genomic circles. Comparison between individual molecules revealed a translocation of ∼774 bp region located between a short repeat of 40 bp in molecule 3 of each mitogenome, and an insertion of the same in molecule 2 of the 10908-06 mitogenome. Finally, phylogenetic analyses revealed a close relationship between the mitogenomes of these clones and previously published potato mitogenomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".