O02.3 Reclassification of Atopobium vaginae as three novel Fannyhessea species: implications for understanding their role in bacterial vaginosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Atopobium vaginae is a prevalent vaginal bacterium associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV). Molecular studies targeting its 16S rRNA gene have shown A. vaginae is a useful diagnostic indicator of BV and important secondary colonizer of the vaginal biofilm. Both A. vaginae and the vagina’s primary biofilm-forming species, Gardnerella vaginalis, exhibit extreme genomic heterogeneity. This led to Gardnerella’s recent split into approximately nine genomospecies indistinguishable by their 16S genes. The objective of this work was to ascertain whether similar subdivisions should be made for A. vaginae. Methods We performed comparative genomics on publically available A. vaginae whole genome sequences. We also genotyped 20 A. vaginae isolates from women participating in a BV treatment study and phenotypically characterized select strains to identify their biochemical properties (API/MIC tests) and virulence potential. Results Three genomospecies were defined by cross-species nucleic acid identity <74%; each shares ≥99% 16S rRNA gene identity and belongs to the new genus Fannyhessea. Two species previously cultured and sequenced are Fannyhessea vaginae (CCUG 38953T, representing 85% of cultured isolates) and Fannyhessea massiliense (Marseille-P4126T, PB189–14T). These species differ in alkaline and acid phosphatase activity, as well as leucine arylamidase activity. Novel Fannyhessea species type 2 was distinguished by its inability to ferment sucrose or tagatose and its sensitivity to metronidazole. Colony morphology, Gram stain, and lack of detectable catalase, indole, sialidase, proteinase, and hyaluronidase activities were similar for all three species. Functional genomics revealed F. vaginae uniquely possesses sialic acid response machinery and several adhesion proteins. Conclusions Genomic and functional differences support redefining A. vaginae as three novel Fannyhessea species. More work is needed to re-examine its role in BV in the absence of confounding by the other species, but our findings suggest F. vaginae may contribute to treatment failure and interact specifically with the Gardnerella biofilm and host epithelium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".