The Role Of Family Support In Physical Activity And Motor Development In Adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Abstract]OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between family background and parental support and physical activity and motor competence in adolescents, and to provide a theoretical basis for the health promotion of children and adolescents in China. METHODS: Select a junior high school in Shanxi Province 12 ~ 14 years old, 140 junior high school students (male 70, female 70) as the research object, the ActiGraph GT3X + model of accelerometer are used to records research object for 7d physical activity, and questionnaire to collect the basic information of the subjects' parents, adopting The Activity Support Scale for Chinese (ACTS - CN) to evaluate the behavior of parents to the child activity support and attitude, The Canadian Agility And Movement Skill Assessment CAMSA was used to evaluate the motor competence development of adolescents. RESULTS: Male students participated in MVPA for 40.57 min every day, while female students participated in MVPA for 31.65 min every day. Male students had higher MVPA than female students. In the motor skill test, the average skill score of male students is 10.8, and the completion time is 17.7 s, while the average skill score of female students is 10.1, and the completion time is 19.1 s. There is no significant difference between the score and completion time of male and female students. Under different family backgrounds, children's sports behaviors are different. Supportive parents are positively correlated with their children's physical activity and motor competence. CONCLUSION: Family environment plays an important role in promoting physical activity and developing motor competence of adolescents, the company of parents and support can significantly affect a child's behavior from several aspects, intervention strategies for adolescent health promotion can include promoting parental activities, through the parents' role models for activity behaviors among adolescents internalizing positive attitude and behavior.[Key words] Family support; Physical activity; Motor competence; Teenagers Supported by Beijing education science programming project(BEAA19045)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".