MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3181268578

膵・消化管神経内分泌腫瘍(GEP-NEN)の診断の進歩

2021· article· ja· W3181268578 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
藤森 尚, ほか

Bibliographic record

VenuePharma Medica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

神経内分泌腫瘍は内分泌細胞を発生母地として全身に発生するが,消化器領域では膵臓と消化管が好発部位であり,膵・消化管神経内分泌腫瘍(gastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrine neoplasms:GEP-NEN)と総称される。希少疾患であるが,近年の疫学研究から疾患頻度の明らかな増加が報告されている1 )2 )。高分化型の神経内分泌腫瘍(neuroendocrine tumor:NET)と低分化型の神経内分泌がん(neuroendocrine carcinoma:NEC)に大別され,基本となる病理分類の理解が必須である。また,分子標的薬やソマトスタチンアナログの登場,内視鏡治療や外科治療の進歩も相まって,GEP-NENの集学的治療が大きく進歩している。GEP-NEN診療において,これらの多様化した治療法を適切に選択するには,正確な診断が何より重要であり,ホルモン産生能の評価,画像診断と組織学的診断がその中心となる。本稿では,2019年に改訂された膵・消化管神経内分泌腫瘍(NEN)診療ガイドライン第2 版(以下,GEP-NEN診療ガイドライン)や病理組織学的分類(WHO分類)も踏まえて,GEP-NEN診断の進歩や今後の展望について概説する。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharma MedicaSame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207