MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3181401834 · doi:10.14740/jmc3718

Lymphomatoid Papulosis Development in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2021· article· en· W3181401834 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kazumi Oura, Tomonobu Satô, Akihiro Iguchi, Naohisa Toriumi, Takeo Sarashina

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLymphomatoid papulosisMycosis fungoidesLymphomaDermatologyIncidence (geometry)BiopsyLymphoproliferative disordersPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) is a chronic, recurrent benign skin disease characterized by histological features of a CD 30-positive cutaneous T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. It is rare, with an annual, worldwide incidence of 1.2 - 1.9 per million, and accounts for 16-47% of pediatric cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders. It often occurs on the extremities or the trunk and rarely affects the face or genitals. Its onset may be triggered by irradiation therapy, immunomodulating agents, infection or atopic dermatitis. It has a benign course but is associated with certain hematological malignancies. Mycosis fungoides and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma are the most commonly associated hematological malignancies. The incidence of lymphoma in children with LyP has been reported to be 8.5% at most. Most patients who develop lymphomas do so within 4 years of the LyP onset; therefore, patients with LyP should be carefully followed up. Herein, we report a case in which tumors appeared in the left scrotum and under the left lip during maintenance therapy for precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We needed to distinguish the tumor from extramedullary recurrence of ALL or de novo other cutaneous lymphoma; however, the histological findings of a tumor biopsy resulted in a diagnosis of LyP. J Med Cases. 2021;12(8):306-309 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc3718

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders researchFrench-language works237,207