Cerebellar Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Facilitates Auditory–Vocal Integration in Spinocerebellar Ataxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical studies have shown the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating movement disorders in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). However, whether similar effects occur for their speech motor disorders remains largely unknown. The present event-related potential study investigated whether and how abnormalities in auditory-vocal integration associated with SCA can be modulated by neuronavigated continuous theta burst stimulation (c-TBS) over the right cerebellum. After receiving active or sham cerebellar c-TBS, 19 patients with SCA were instructed to produce sustained vowels while hearing their voice unexpectedly pitch-shifted by ±200 cents. Behaviorally, active cerebellar c-TBS led to smaller magnitudes of vocal compensations for pitch perturbations than sham stimulation. Parallel modulatory effects were also observed at the cortical level, as reflected by increased P1 and P2 responses but decreased N1 responses elicited by active cerebellar c-TBS. Moreover, smaller magnitudes of vocal compensations were predicted by larger amplitudes of cortical P1 and P2 responses. These findings provide the first neurobehavioral evidence that c-TBS over the right cerebellum produces modulatory effects on abnormal auditory-motor integration for vocal pitch regulation in patients with SCA, offering a starting point for the treatment of speech motor disorders associated with SCA with cerebellar c-TBS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".