MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

STUDI MIKROENKAPSULASI MINYAK IKAN KAYA ASAM LEMAK OMEGA-3 DARI LIMBAH CAIR INDUSTRI PENGALENGAN IKA.N LEMURU (LEMURU PRECOOK OIL):

2007· article· id· W3181974774 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mustaufik Mustaufik, Erminawati Erminawati

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah · 2007
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFish oilFish <Actinopterygii>Food scienceMathematicsPeroxide valueChemistryRandomized block designAnimal scienceBiologyFisheryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

industry which has very low economic value.  The oil mostly used on paint and vernis industries, also as additive for feed.  The oil contain omega-3 fatty acid about 19-23  % (Setiabudi,  1990 and Riyanto, 1995).   The usage oflemuru precook oil on food industries has not been studied. Aim of this research was to study the usage ofliquid waste or by-product oflemuru canning industry for high value food product i.e.  microencapsulation  ofomega-3  rich fish oil and its consumers prefer• ence test. Experiment design used in the research was Randomized  Block Design (RBD) with two factors treatments; encapsulant proponion gelatin-maltodekstrin (E)ofl  :   I, 1   :  2,2:  1  and 2: 3 (w/ w), and lemuru fish oil and encapsulants proportions (M) of 1   : 2 and I : 4 (v/w).  The lemuru fish oil was prepared using method of Elizabeth (l 992), and its microencapsulation using method of'Kartika (2003).  Variables observed  were; water-content, total-oil,  capsulated-oil content, uncapsulated• oil, FFA, Omega-3 fatty acid content,  peroxide-number,   microenkapsulation efficiency, yield, microenkapsule performance (textur), and consumers preference test (flavor and aftertaste ofoil). The physico-chemical  data was analyzed using F Test and DMRTTest  5%, and the preference Test data analyzed using Friedman Test and Multiple Comparison Test (Dannie!,  1999). The best treat· ments combination was determined using effective Index Test (DeGarmo, Canada  and Sullivan, 1998).   Result of the research showed that treatment combination  ofE4M I; i.e. treatments of proportion of2 :  3 (w/w) gelatin-maltodekstrin,  and proportion of I  : 2 (w/v) fish oil-encapsulant produced meicroencapsule  with the best physico-chemical  properties.  The product has characteristics  of: Omega-3  fatty acid content of20,95  percents (0,34  percents, linolenat acid,  3,35 per• cents, EPA, and 17 ,26 percents, DHA), total-oil  of 18,376   percents, uncapsulated-oil of2,3  I 8 percents, microencapsulation efficiency of36,857  percents, water-content ofS,273 percents, FFA of3,249 percents, peroxide-number of 1,265  (meq/k.g), and yield of98,23  l percents. Based on the results, suggested that the advantage of encapsulation  using freeze drier technique produce fish oil microencapsule with relatively low inwater content ( < 5 percents), and low Omega-3 fatty acid degradation (1-2 percents),  however, its FFA content still high and sensory properties still not preferencesby consummers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa TengahSame topicFood and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207