IMPLEMENTASI ZAKAT CORE PRINCIPLES DALAM PENDISTRIBUSIAN ZAKAT DI BAITUL MAL KOTA BANDA ACEH
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the implementation of the Zakat Core Principles (ZCP) in the distribution of zakat at Baitul Mal Kota (BMK) Banda Aceh, which includes; determining the distribution to mustahik, determining the distribution area of zakat, and the performance of zakat distribution based on ratio indicators and disbursement time. This research is a qualitative descriptive study using interviews and documents/archives related to the implementation of zakat distribution. The results showed that Baitul Mal Kota Banda Aceh has implemented the Zakat Core Principles in determining the distribution of zakat to mustahik, and determining the area of zakat distribution. The performance of zakat distribution is based on the calculation of the Zakat Core Principles, the average disbursement of zakat funds through the Disbursement to Collection Ratio (DCR) showed a value exceeding 90% (included in the very effective category), the disbursement of zakat funds for consumptive programs is carried out once every quarter (including in the good category), while for productive programs every 12 months or once a year (included in the good category). It is hoped that the Zakat Core Principles will be implemented comprehensively at Baitul Mal Kota Banda Aceh in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it