MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182147981 · doi:10.11575/prism/38922

Air-Sea CO₂ Cycling in Arctic Coastal Seas: Case Studies in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and Hudson Bay

2020· dissertation· en· W3182147981 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Mohamed Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Acidification Effects and Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArcticNetManitoba Hydro
KeywordsBayArchipelagoOceanographyArcticCyclingThe arcticGeographyEnvironmental scienceArctic dipole anomalyClimatologyGeologyArctic ice packArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In contrast to the open ocean, the sources and sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) in the coastal ocean are source of large uncertainties when budgeting the global ocean carbon sink. This is mainly because of the different characteristics of coastal seas, and strong spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Furthermore, the coastal ocean has been substantially impacted by human activities (e.g., hydroelectric damming, overfishing, shipping, etc.) and is now considered one of the most sensitive parts of the marine environment to climate change. As a result, it is vital to study the carbon cycle and quantify the air-sea CO₂ fluxes in these regions to predict and understand how they may change in response to future climate change. In this thesis, I address this knowledge gap in two Arctic coastal seas by studying the spatial and temporal variability of surface water CO₂ partial pressure (pCO₂) and by quantifying air-sea CO₂ fluxes. Using continuous underway ship measurements of pCO₂, salinity, sea surface temperature, and chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentrations, we quantified the multi-annual variability of air-sea CO₂ exchange in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and provided a baseline estimate of CO₂ sources and sinks in Hudson Bay during the spring and early summer seasons. Both study regions acted as a net oceanic sink with an average air-sea CO₂ flux of -7.7 and -7.2 TgC yr⁻¹ in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and Hudson Bay, respectively. In the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, we estimated an increase in the atmospheric CO₂ uptake in the last four decades due to an increase in sea ice loss and higher wind speeds. In Hudson Bay, we observed a distinct spatial pattern in pCO₂ related to proximity from freshwater sources, with supersaturated pCO₂ (relative to the atmosphere) measured near river mouths, and undersaturated pCO₂ in offshore and ice-melt influenced waters. This thesis budgeted the CO₂ sources and sinks in a third of the Arctic shelf seas area (about 36%) and shows the importance of accounting for the spatiotemporal variability of coastal shelves to get better estimates of the carbon budget in the Arctic Ocean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicOcean Acidification Effects and ResponsesFrench-language works237,207