MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3182382567 · doi:10.82308/46472

Food, rationing, and national identity in midcentury British fiction

2017· article· en· W3182382567 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ariel Buckley

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsRationingIdentity (music)ArtPolitical scienceHistoryEconomicsAestheticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation charts the construction of national identity in mid-twentieth-century British literature and culture through a focus on food. While official food cultures emerged out of scientific findings, they were predicated on ethical conceptions of good citizenship. Emphasizing stoicism and self-sacrifice, the wartime Ministry of Food linked the purchase, preparation, and consumption of food to heroism and treachery. After the Second World War, controlled distribution and "fair shares" became pillars of welfare state reforms, which sought to ensure that those who had fought and worked for the national good never went hungry. Though rationing and food controls led to discontent in the postwar period, the ideal of shared sacrifice remained a potent symbol of national identity. Midcentury British novelists registered their responses to shifting food and nutrition policies by adapting, distorting, and challenging patriotic models of consumption. Chapter One draws upon theories of hospitality to explore depictions of invasion—by foreign cuisines, cultures, and armies—in wartime fiction. As the Second World War disrupted host-guest relations, anxieties about selecting, cooking, and consuming traditional foods reflected larger threats to British identity. Novels by Elizabeth Taylor, Patrick Hamilton, P.G. Wodehouse, and Evelyn Waugh process fears of cultural and national invasion through portrayals of shared meals and domestic space. Chapter Two reads thriller novels against civilian and military health guidelines to delineate a midcentury ideal of patriotic, masculine eating defined by self-discipline. In Ian Fleming's James Bond novels and Geoffrey Household's Rogue Male (1939), food fortifies spies' bodies and minds. Such fortification occurs within a larger generic history that extends from Robert Baden-Powell's Scouting for Boys (1908) and John Buchan's The 39 Steps (1915) to Alan Sillitoe's Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (1958). Chapter Three analyzes culinary encounters among Britain, France, and the Mediterranean to illustrate the paradoxical treatment of foreign foodways in wartime and postwar literature and culture. Barbara Pym's novelistic depictions of food and eating intersect with food writing by Elizabeth David, Fanny Cradock, and others. Their engagement with gendered food roles and models of communal consumption reflects larger patterns of public and private dining in the welfare state. Chapter Four explores the restriction of consumption in novels by Muriel Spark and Nancy Mitford in relation to postwar fashion and slimming culture. Portraying slenderness as a marker of sophistication, their novels prioritize the competitive cultivation of beauty over collectivity and patriotism. Both authors scrutinize femininity, morality, and citizenship to depict slimming as simultaneously empowering and oppressive. Reading fictional meals against literary and historical contexts, this project calls attention to conceptions of nationalism, gender, class, and cultural distinction embedded in the preparation and consumption of food. Just as heroes of midcentury thrillers feed themselves to prepare for battle, eating both fortifies citizens for sociopolitical engagement and concretely performs that engagement. In midcentury novels, discourses around diet, nutrition, and healthy eating shape national identity symbolically, narratively, and ideologically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicCulinary Culture and Tourism→French-language works237,207→