MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182458963 · doi:10.36987/jes.v8i1.1971

KESIAPAN PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN TATAP MUKA (PTM) DI MASA NEW NORMAL PANDEMI COVID-19 (Studi Kasus di SMPN 2 Siberut Utara, Kabupaten Kepulauan Mentawai)

2021· article· id· W3182458963 on OpenAlexaff
Manganju Manik

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL EDUSCIENCE · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesChemistryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pandemi Covid-19 membuat sekolah harus siap dengan kondisi penerapan new normal yangmengacu pada pola pendidikan yang ditetapkan oleh pemerintah karena proses PembelajaranTatap Muka (PTM) akan dilakukan seperti biasa di sekolah. Penelitian yang dilaksanakanadalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus mengenai kesiapan sekolahterhadap PTM di masa new normal pandemi Covid-19 di SMPN 2 Siberut Utara. PersiapanSMPN 2 Siberut Utara sesuai protokoler kesehatan diantaranya adalah peserta didik dan guruwajib menggunakan masker baik masker kain maupun masker bedah di lingkungan sekolah,mencuci tangan dengan sabun pada tempat yang sudah disediakan, mengecek suhu tubuh,menjaga jarak antar peserta didik di dalam kelas dengan penataan tempat duduk sesuai jarakyang ditentukan maupun di luar kegiatan belajar mengajar dengan tetap menjaga jarak, adanyaproses penyemprotan disinfektan di dalam kelas dan lingkungan sekolah secara rutin, sertasekolah juga membuat sosialisasi pencegahan Covid-19 di SMPN 2 Siberut Utara melaluispanduk pencegahan Covid-19 yang ditempelkan di lingkungan sekolah. SMPN 2 Siberut Utaramemiliki kesiapan yang sudah sesuai dengan anjuran pemerintah dalam pelaksanaanPembelajaran tatap Muka (PTM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL EDUSCIENCESame topicEducational Curriculum and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207