KESIAPAN PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN TATAP MUKA (PTM) DI MASA NEW NORMAL PANDEMI COVID-19 (Studi Kasus di SMPN 2 Siberut Utara, Kabupaten Kepulauan Mentawai)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pandemi Covid-19 membuat sekolah harus siap dengan kondisi penerapan new normal yangmengacu pada pola pendidikan yang ditetapkan oleh pemerintah karena proses PembelajaranTatap Muka (PTM) akan dilakukan seperti biasa di sekolah. Penelitian yang dilaksanakanadalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus mengenai kesiapan sekolahterhadap PTM di masa new normal pandemi Covid-19 di SMPN 2 Siberut Utara. PersiapanSMPN 2 Siberut Utara sesuai protokoler kesehatan diantaranya adalah peserta didik dan guruwajib menggunakan masker baik masker kain maupun masker bedah di lingkungan sekolah,mencuci tangan dengan sabun pada tempat yang sudah disediakan, mengecek suhu tubuh,menjaga jarak antar peserta didik di dalam kelas dengan penataan tempat duduk sesuai jarakyang ditentukan maupun di luar kegiatan belajar mengajar dengan tetap menjaga jarak, adanyaproses penyemprotan disinfektan di dalam kelas dan lingkungan sekolah secara rutin, sertasekolah juga membuat sosialisasi pencegahan Covid-19 di SMPN 2 Siberut Utara melaluispanduk pencegahan Covid-19 yang ditempelkan di lingkungan sekolah. SMPN 2 Siberut Utaramemiliki kesiapan yang sudah sesuai dengan anjuran pemerintah dalam pelaksanaanPembelajaran tatap Muka (PTM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it