MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182608050 · doi:10.1093/jcbiol/ruab030

OUP accepted manuscript

2021· article· en· W3182608050 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda Lawrence, Bradley G. Stevens, Burton Shank, J. Sook Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crustacean Biology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Standards and Technology
KeywordsBiologyDecapodaLibrary scienceFisheryCrustacean

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fisheries management requires a thorough understanding of the processes involved in reproduction, including the ability to distinguish sexually mature individuals. The Jonah crab, Cancer borealisStimpson, 1859, occurs from Newfoundland to Florida, but the fishery is concentrated in New England. The crab contributes to a significant and growing male-driven fishery; however, little is known about its life history. We investigated the relationship between morphometrics and physiological maturity, and the size at which these life changes occur in the southern New England stock. The size at 50% sexual maturity (SM50) in male C. borealis was estimated morphometrically to be 105.9 mm carapace width (CW). This size is larger than the estimate of 98.3 mm CW for the species in the Mid-Atlantic Bight but lower than the estimate of 127.6 on the Scotian Shelf, consistent with a poleward gradient in size at maturity. The gonadosomatic index differs significantly between CW size groups, maturity status, and season whereas spermatophore size was not related to CW. Fisheries management should include multiple measures of sexual maturity and consider factors including geographical distribution when establishing and assessing guidelines for this economically important species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crustacean BiologySame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207