MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182628964 · doi:10.1122/8.0000247

The yielding of attractive gels of nanocrystal cellulose (CNC)

2021· article· en· W3182628964 on OpenAlex
Marziyeh Danesh, Aref Abbasi Moud, Damien Mauran, Sassan Hojabr, Richard M. Berry, Marek Pawlik, Savvas G. Hatzikiriakos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rheology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCelluForce (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceRheologyComposite materialShear rateShear stressStrain rateThixotropySlip (aerodynamics)Thermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flow behavior of nanocrystalline cellulose (CNC) hydrogels in the presence of a monovalent electrolyte (NaCl) as a function of CNC and salt concentration is explored using a variety of linear and nonlinear rheological tests. We have first observed an apparent “slip yield stress” at small wall shear stress values that is mainly due to the onset of solidlike slippage of the hydrogels before their true yielding and deformation. This flow regime and the “slip yield stress” can be eliminated using a sandpaper of an optimum grit size. At higher wall shear stress values, two yielding points for the CNC/salt network are seen in strain sweep tests due to network disruption and cluster deformation that depend on the concentration of both CNC (1–5 wt. %) and electrolyte (0–100 mM). The first yield stress is due to yielding and flow of clusters, while the second one is due to breakage of clusters to small flocs and individual fibers. These yielding stresses were obtained by a variety of tests including strain amplitude sweep, creep, and steady shear, and their values are compared confirming their existence. Rheo-SALS (small angle light scattering) measurements confirmed structural changes as the scattering patterns change from isotropic to highly anisotropic with an increase of deformation and rate of deformation. Moreover, confocal laser scanning microscopy and polarized microscopy images confirm the gradual breakup of clusters to smaller ones and eventually to nearly individual fibers with an increase in the applied shear strain and rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it