The Genetic Contribution to Drug Response in Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) are a group of diseases with a high heritability, whose pathogenesis is strongly determined by an interplay between genetic and environmental factor. Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine whether genetic variants could also influence response to therapy in SpA. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science core collection, without publication-year restrictions (Last search 8th April 2021). The search strategy was formulated according to the PEO format (Population, Exposure, Outcome) for observational studies. The population was adult (≥18 years) patients with SpA. The exposure was inheritable genetic variations of any gene involved in the disease pathogenesis/drug metabolism. The outcome was response to the drug, both as dichotomous (response yes/no) and as continuous outcomes. Exclusion criteria were: (1) languages other than English, (2) case series, case reports, editorials, and reviews, (3) studies reporting genetic contribution to drug response only limited to extra-musculoskeletal features of SpA, (4) epigenetic modifications. Quality of the included study was independently assessed by two authors. Results: After deduplication, 393 references were screened by two authors, which led to the final inclusion of 26 articles, pertinent with the research question, that were considered for qualitative synthesis. Among these, 10 cohort, one cross-sectional, and five case-control studies were considered of at least good quality according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). In studies about TNF-blockers therapy: (1) polymorphisms of the TNF receptor superfamily 1A/1B (TNFRSF1A/1B) genes were most frequently able to predict response, (2) −238 and −308 polymorphisms of TNFα gene were studied with conflicting results, (3) TNFα polymorphism rs1799724, rs1799964, −857, −1,013, +489 predicted drug response in non-adjusted analysis, (4) PDE3A rs3794271 had a linear relationship with DAS28 reduction after anti-TNFα therapy. DHFR polymorphism +35,289 was able to predict response to methotrexate. Conclusions: Our SLR highlighted the existence of a genetic component in determining drug response. However, further studies are warranted to better define quantify it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.058 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".