Osmium‐ and Cobalt‐Terpyridine‐Based Electrochromic Devices for “Smart” Signage Application: The Effect of Lighting on Color Perception
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Modern electrochromic devices (ECDs) have found a wide range of applications, which are not limited to the traditional design of “smart” windows and self‐dimming mirrors. Novel cutting‐edge applications in optoelectronics and particularly in low‐energy displays and “smart” signage require electrochromic materials (ECMs) that demonstrate significant changes in optical density, fast switching times, and color differences between the colored and bleached states that are visible to the naked eye. Here ECMs that are designed by the chemical deposition of electrochromic Co(II) and Os(II) complexes and their mixture on surface‐enhanced support fabricated by screen printing of indium–tin oxide (ITO‐50) nanoparticles are presented on an ITO/glass substrate. The oxidation state of the metal complexes is reversibly addressed by voltage switching between −1 and +3 V. Further assembly of the ECMs and ITO/glass counter electrode using gel electrolyte results in solid‐state ECDs. The changes in optical properties of these ECDs induced by the metal oxidation state alteration are tracked by recording UV–vis spectra. Moreover, here color differences (CDs) and changes in luminance of ECDs (Δ L ) in the colored and bleached state are compared when illuminated with light‐emitting diodes (LEDs) of different colors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it