Yoga bodies, yoga minds: contextualising the health discourses and practices of modern postural yoga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yoga bodies, yoga minds: contextualising the health discourses and practices of modern postural yogaThis special issue of Anthropology and Medicine explores yoga's recent, rapid, global expansion as a health and wellness practice.The global yoga industry is currently estimated to be worth 88 billion dollars annually, and to have some 300 million practitioners, mainly in India, but also in the United States and Europe where yoga consumption and revenue has roughly doubled in the past eight years (Zuckerman 2020).Today, yoga's myriad forms offer practitioners a combination of postural work, breathing, and meditative techniques with the overall aim of improving health, strength, fitness, and a sense of wellbeing.Drawing on research in in India, Europe, North America, Canada, Japan, and online spaces, this special issue examines some of the contexts and localities where yoga is practiced, exploring who takes it up, what motivates them to do so, and how yoga is understood to influence health and wellbeing.The contributors to this special issue are scholars who participated in our panel on Yoga Bodies at the Association of Social Anthropologists' Conference on Sociality, Matter, and the Imagination: Re-creating Anthropology held at the University of Oxford in September 2018.The panel was concerned with exploring the diverse ways in which the biological, social and material converge in the creation of 'yoga bodies' .While aspects of the body provided the starting point for each presentation, ideas about health, wellbeing or living a 'good life' emerged as a central thread across almost all of the papers.We therefore decided to develop the theme of health and wellbeing for this special issue.In this Introduction, we start by giving some historical background to understanding yoga's current global popularity as a practice for health and wellbeing.Without attempting a comprehensive review, we select from the modern yoga scholarship aspects of this history that may be unfamiliar to non-specialist readers and may counter some current stereotypes: that yoga is an ancient Hindu or pre-Hindu practice with a linear unchanging history; that yoga is an essentially feminine practice of gentle stretching and relaxation; and that yoga is the product of the Californian counterculture of the 1960s.That there is some truth in these stereotypes may help explain yoga's current myriad forms and some of the tensions between them.However, the recent scholarship complicates these views and establishes that yoga has a multilinear and transnational history (Alter 2004;Singleton 2010;Newcombe 2019).It shows that modern postural yoga emerged as a contemporary practice for health and wellbeing only within the 'just-past of the present' , as Joseph Alter puts it -that is, over the past approximately 100-150 years -through the interactive effects of the international physical culture movement, Hindu nationalism, gender, naturopathy, and science (2004, xvi).Below we indicate some key themes in this complex, intriguing, and sometimes surprising story.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".