THE HYBRID SUBISCHIAL SOCKET FOR PERSONS WITH TRANSFEMORAL AMPUTATION: GAIT PARAMETERS AND CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF A CASE SERIES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The subischial socket interface design is a promising new shape of socket for persons with transfemoral amputation. Typically, the proximal trim line is located distal to the ischial tuberosity, improving comfort in prosthetic users without interfering with gait parameters compared to Ischial Containment Socket (ICS). No studies have investigated the performances of a subischial sockets with suction suspension system. A new subischial socket (Hybrid Subischial Socket - HySS) combined with a hypobaric passive suspension system has been recently developed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of HySS in terms of comfort, hip range-of-motion and gait parameters. METHODOLOGY: Three persons with transfemoral amputation were tested first using their usual ICS and then after one month of continuous use of HySS. FINDINGS: The following parameters improved in all participants using HySS: 1) hip range-of-motion, 2) walking speed and distance, 3) Timed-Up-and-Go-Test time, 4) stride length, 5) double support duration, 6) peak value of hip extension during stance, 7) satisfaction with the prosthesis. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the use of HySS could allow improvements for prosthetic use. Layman’s Abstract This case series describes the effects of a subischial socket combined with a hypobaric suction suspension system for persons with transfemoral amputation. This socket has the proximal trim line located distally to the ischial tuberosity and it does not interact with the pelvis. The results have shown that this socket may improve the overall prosthetic comfort, hip range of motion and some gait parameters compared to the conventional ischial containment socket. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/36252/28095 How To Cite: Pellegrini R, Denza G, Brunelli S, Zenardi D, Imperio M, Vannozzi G, Traballesi M. The hybrid subischial socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: gait parameters and clinical assessment of a case series. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2021;Volume 4, Issue 1, No.9. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i1.36252 Corresponding Author: Stefano Brunelli, MDFondazione Santa Lucia, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care, Rome, Italy.E-Mail: s.brunelli@hsantalucia.itORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5986-1564
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".