MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183903765 · doi:10.1155/2021/6980617

Correlation Analysis of External Environment Risk Factors for High-Speed Railway Derailment Based on Unstructured Data

2021· article· en· W3183903765 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haixing Wang, Yuanlanduo Tian, Hong Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChina Railway
KeywordsDerailmentAssociation rule learningEvent (particle physics)Data miningComputer scienceNear missProcess (computing)Fault (geology)Matching (statistics)EngineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Reliability engineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In railway operation, unsafe events such as faults may occur, and a large number of unsafe event records are generated in the process of unsafe events’ recording and reporting. Unsafe events have been described in unstructured natural language, which often has inconsistent structure and complex sources, involving multiple railway specialties, with multisource, heterogeneous, and unstructured characteristics. In practical application, the efficiency of processing is extremely low, leading to potentially unsafe management utilization. Based on the data on unsafe events, this paper utilizes big data processing technology, conducts association rules mining and association degree analysis, extracts the word segmentation, and obtains the feature vector of unsafe fault event data. At the same time, the unsafe event data analysis model is constructed in combination with regular expression and pattern matching technology. This paper establishes the matching model of high-speed railway derailment-based external environment risk factors and applies it to the occurrence of unsafe events. This model could be utilized to analyze and excavate the link between external environment risk factors and the occurrence of unsafe events and carry out the automatic extraction of characteristic information such as risk possibility and consequence severity; hence, it has potential for identifying, with enhanced accuracy, high-risk factors that may lead to high-speed railway derailment. Based on this study, we could make full use of the unsafe event data, forecast the risk trend, and discover the law of high-speed railway derailment. This study introduces a viable approach to analyzing the unsafe event data, forecasting risk trend, and conceptualizing high-speed railway derailment. It could also enforce the accurate quantification of high-speed railway safety situation, refine the risk index and conduct in-depth analysis combined with the model, and effectively support the digitalization and intellectualization of high-speed railway operation safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207