Moiré patterns of twisted bilayer antimonene and their structural and electronic transition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interlayer twisting in two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures often leads to a periodic moiré pattern which is a superlattice structure on top of the original atomic lattice of the 2D layers. The formation of a moiré superlattice can be accompanied by a significant structural reconstruction and ultra-flat electronic bands. The moiré superlattice is typically built with a tunable scale by controlling the rotation angle θ between the individual 2D layers. In this paper, we report the structural reconstruction and electronic transition in moiré patterns of twisted bilayer antimonene, based on Kohn-Sham density functional theory calculations. Starting from rigid moiré structures, the atomic relaxation leads to an array of high-symmetry stacking domains with soliton boundaries through a vortex-like reconstruction. For twist angle θ≤ 6.01°, the impact of the structural reconstruction on the electronic bands becomes very significant, in the appearance of flat bands at the valence band edge, and no magic angle is required for the flat bands to appear in the 2D Sb moiré patterns. Both inhomogeneous interlayer hybridization and local strain are found to be responsible for the formation of these flat electronic bands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".