An investigation on the bubbly flow of a <scp>Venturi</scp> channel based on the population balance model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, the bubbly flow characteristics of a Venturi channel was revealed by using the population balance model (PBM) within the framework of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation and focused on the bubble size distribution and pressure drop △ P of different regions. The simulation results indicated that bubble breakup mainly occurred in the diverging section of the Venturi channel, and the average diameter of the daughter bubbles d avg in the sidewall region was much smaller than that in the central region. Through the correlational analysis between the bubble size distribution and turbulent flow field, the bubble breakup in the diverging section was positively related to the turbulent flow. Considering the influence of geometric parameters on d avg and △ P , the d avg decreased and △ P increased with the increasing of the diverging angle β . As the throat diameter D increased, the d avg increased and △ P decreased gradually. In order to quantify the bubble breakup characteristics, the concept of bubble breakup ratio τ is introduced and defined as the ratio of inlet average bubble diameter d i to the outlet average bubble diameter d o . Through dimensionless transformation, the fitting relationship between τ or △ P and angle ratio a was Sinusoidal function (SINE), respectively, and was Boltzmann with the throat length‐diameter ratio b . Due to the relationship of first‐order linear function between τ and △ P , the bubble breakup ratio can be obtained by measuring the pressure drop of the Venturi tube, which was significant to the practical engineering application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".