Le droit de contracter avec l'État : Le principe d'égalité devant le service public en droit des marchés publics québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommaire Pour favoriser la concurrence entre les entreprises qui participent aux appels d’offres des organismes publics, une certaine jurisprudence reconnaît historiquement un droit égal à toutes les entreprises de conclure un contrat avec l'État : il s'agirait d’une expression du principe d'égalité devant le service public. Or, en parallèle avec les travaux de la Commission d'enquête sur l'industrie de la construction, le législateur québécois a adopté diverses normes visant à restreindre les entreprises pouvant déposer une soumission en réponse à un appel d'offres d'un organisme public ou municipal québécois. Ce principe est‐il toujours applicable au Québec, et si oui, quelle est sa portée au vu des modifications législatives récentes? Contracter avec l'État québécois est‐il toujours un droit, ou s'agit‐il maintenant plutôt d'un privilège?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".