MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184086972 · doi:10.1177/11206721211035636

Long-term retinal changes in progressive geographic atrophy

2021· article· en· W3184086972 on OpenAlex
Denise Gallagher, Gagan Kalra, Mohammed Abdul Rasheed, Kiran Kumar Vupparaboina, Sumit Randhir Singh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Ophthalmology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOuter nuclear layerRetinalRetinal pigment epitheliumOphthalmologyOptical coherence tomographyMacular degenerationRetinaMedicineAtrophyDrusenOpticsPathologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of blindness with loss of retinal layers over long term. We aim to evaluate these changes in eyes with progressive non-exudative AMD with geographic atrophy (GA). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with GA with a minimum of 4 years follow up. Retinal layers on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were segmented based on their reflectivity patterns using validated semi-automated segmentation algorithm. The thickness of the segmented retinal layers was measured. Horizontal length of GA at baseline and last follow-up were also measured. Regression analysis was performed to correlate changes in RPE layer thickness with other retinal layers and the length of GA on OCT. Results: A total of 351-line scans including 17 foveal scans showing presence of GA at final visit that is, a total of 2457 retinal layer bands were analyzed. Outer nuclear layer (ONL) ( p = 0.02), outer segment layers (OSL) ( p = 0.01), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) ( p = 0.01) showed a statistically significant variation between baseline and final visit. Regression analysis showed the change in ONL ( r = 0.72; p = 0.01) and OSL ( r = 0.93, p < 0.01) correlated significantly with change in RPE thickness whereas rest of the layers failed to show significant correlation. Conclusion: Outer retinal layers (ONL and OSL) show more significant and widespread changes in retinal thickness and correlated most significantly with RPE thickness changes in eyes with GA due to AMD. Assessment of various retinal layer bands can be used as surrogate quantitative parameters to study eyes with GA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it