MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184096580 · doi:10.3748/wjg.v27.i28.4722

Relationship between clinical features and intestinal microbiota in Chinese patients with ulcerative colitis

2021· article· en· W3184096580 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xuxia He, Ying‐He Li, Pengguang Yan, Xiangchen Meng, Chuyan Chen, Kemin Li, Jingnan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisMedicineGastroenterologyDysbiosisInflammatory bowel diseaseMicrobiomeInternal medicineColitisGut floraImmunologyBiologyDiseaseBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Dysbacteriosis may be a crucial environmental factor for ulcerative colitis (UC). Further study is required on microbiota alterations in the gastrointestinal tract of patients with UC for better clinical management and treatment. AIM: To analyze the relationship between different clinical features and the intestinal microbiota, including bacteria and fungi, in Chinese patients with UC. METHODS: Eligible inpatients were enrolled from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019, and stool and mucosa samples were collected. UC was diagnosed by endoscopy, pathology, Mayo Score, and Montreal classification. Gene amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene and fungal internal transcribed spacer gene was used to detect the intestinal microbiota composition. Alpha diversity, principal component analysis, similarity analysis, and Metastats analysis were employed to evaluate differences among groups. RESULTS: showed the opposite trend. More intermicrobial correlations in UC in remission than in active patients were observed. The bacteria-fungi correlations became single and uneven in patients with UC. CONCLUSION: The intestinal bacteria flora of patients with UC differs significantly in terms of various sample types and disease activities. The intermicrobial correlations change in patients with UC compared with non-IBD controls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of GastroenterologySame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207