MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184100932 · doi:10.1061/jpeodx.0000305

Modeling Pavement Performance Indices in Harsh Climate Regions

2021· article· en· W3184100932 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdualmtalab Abdualaziz Ali, Heena Dhasmana, Kamal Hossain, Amgad Hussein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transportation Engineering Part B Pavements · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational Roughness IndexRutServiceability (structure)Environmental scienceForensic engineeringCrackingDurabilityGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringSurface finishAsphaltGeographyComputer scienceCartographyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Newfoundland and Labrador lies in the northeastern corner of North America. Road durability in this province is negatively affected by the harsh climate and ever-increasing traffic loads. The provincial five-year road plan emphasizes the maintenance and rehabilitation of existing pavements. For this purpose, basic parameters determining pavement condition should be evaluated. These include the determination of International Roughness Index (IRI), Present Serviceability Rating (PSR), and Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of roads in the city of St. John’s, Newfoundland. A smartphone application called TotalPave was used to measure IRI values. To compute PCI, ASTM International D6433-18 standard was adopted, and a questionnaire was distributed among drivers to obtain PSR. In addition, pavement distress data were collected for major and minor roads. Pavement distresses such as rutting, block cracking, fatigue cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, delamination, potholes, and patching were analyzed, and a correlation was developed between the roughness and distress measurements. Roads were found to be in a noticeably inferior condition and PCI values correlated the most with the extent of pavement distresses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transportation Engineering Part B PavementsSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207