Beech and fir forest resources in the Pešter plain area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to EUNIS classification, the analysed stands belong to a mixed beech-fir forest type (G4.61). The soils are eutric cambisol, eutric rankers, distric cambisol and luvisol. 65 plants were identified, out of which 6 tree species, 9 shrub species and 50 ground flora species. The ecological indices have the following averages values: humidity from 2.90 to 3.00, soil chemical reaction from 2.71 to 3.15, nutrient matter from 2.55 to 2.83, light from 2.28 to 2.60 and temperature from 2.56 to 3.07. Out of the total number of recorded plants, 29, that is, 46.0% are medicinal, namely; 4 species come under healing class one, 2 come under healing class two, 11 come under healing class three, 6 come under healing class four and 6 come under healing class five. The following fruit tree species were identified: Vaccinium myrtillis, Crataegus monogyna, Fragaria vesca, Sorbus aucuparia, Lonicera nigra, Rubus hirtus, Sorbus austriacus. 24 melliferous plants were recorded in beech and fir forests, out of which 6 woody, 6 shrub and 10 herbaceous plants. The highest number of melliferous plants blossom in May. The beech and fir forest was recorded on 464.09 hectares. The total volume is 161,015 m3 . The trees with a diameter lower than 30 cm account for 51.5%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".