MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184268904 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109456

Prostaglandin E2 amplifies IL-17 production by γδ T cells during barrier inflammation

2021· article· en· W3184268904 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Polese, Bavanitha Thurairajah, Hualin Zhang, Cindy Leung Soo, Clara A McMahon, Ghislaine Fontès, Sabah N. A. Hussain, Valérie Abadie, Irah L. King

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunityMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersKenneth Rainin Foundation
KeywordsInflammationEicosanoidBiologyImmunologyCytokineCell biologyLipid signalingProstaglandin E2Innate lymphoid cellBarrier functionInnate immune systemImmune systemEndocrinologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interleukin-17 (IL-17)-producing γδ (γδ17) T cells are innate-like lymphocytes that contribute to protective anti-microbial responses but are also implicated in pathogenic inflammation at barrier sites. Understanding tissue-specific signals that regulate this subset is important to boost host defense mechanisms, but also to mitigate immunopathology. Here, we demonstrate that prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ), a cyclooxygenase-dependent member of the eicosanoid family, directly enhances cytokine production by circulating and tissue-specific γδ17 T cells in vitro . Gain- and loss-of-function in vivo approaches further reveal that although provision of PGE 2 amplifies psoriasiform inflammation, ablation of host mPGES1-dependent PGE 2 synthesis is dispensable for cutaneous γδ17 T cell activation. By contrast, loss of endogenous PGE 2 production or depletion of the gut microbiota compromises intestinal γδ17 T cell responses and increases disease severity during experimental colitis. Together, our results demonstrate how a lipid mediator can synergize with tissue-specific signals to enhance innate lymphocyte production of IL-17 during barrier inflammation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207