Discontinuity in the Realization of the Vienna Peedee Belemnite Carbon Isotope Ratio Scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By convention, carbon isotope ratios are expressed relative to VPDB defined by the calcite standard NBS19 in the 1980s. [See T. Coplen, Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 273–276.] To improve the realization of the VPDB scale, a second fixed point (lithium carbonate, LSVEC) was introduced in 2006 [T. Coplen et al. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 2439–2441], which is now known to be isotopically unstable. [Assonov, S. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 2018, 32, 827–830.] With the high-quality reference materials made available in 2020, it is now possible to realize the VPDB scale with high confidence. [Assonov, S. et al. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 2020, 34, e8867; Assonov, S. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 35, e9014; Qi, H. et al. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrosc. 2021, 35, e9006.] Here, we report the analysis of 25 reference materials using isotope ratio combustion mass spectrometry, show the discontinuity between the values measured against the new IAEA reference materials and the values currently assigned to these reference materials on the VPDB2006, and provide a link bringing these materials onto the new VPDB2020.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".