MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184395423

Low vulnerability of the human retina to SARS-CoV-2 infection-potential role of the choroidal vasculature

2021· article· en· W3184395423 on OpenAlexaff
Steffen E. Künzel, Thore Bürgel, Sandrine H. Künzel, Joel P. Howard, Alexandre Dubrac

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinaChoroidRetinalBiologyCell typeCellPathologyComputational biologyMedicineOphthalmologyGeneticsNeuroscience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose : Ocular manifestations have been described in COVID-19 patients, but it is unknown whether SARS-CoV-2 - the causal agent in COVID-19 - can directly infect posterior ocular tissues. Here, we investigate SARS-CoV-2 host factor gene expression levels and their distribution across retinal and choroidal cell types. The overall aim is to identify particularly vulnerable cell-types to elucidate a potential pathomechanism for observed retinal lesions in COVID-19 patients. Methods : Datasets from human retina and choroid were retrieved from published datasets. We reprocessed the data from raw quantification matrix following standard Seurat (v.3.1) clustering procedure. To take advantage of the improved Seurat pre processing and normalization workflow, we used the SCTransform function, thereby we “corrected” log-normalized expression values across datasets. To reannotate the cells, multiple clusterings of different resolutions were generated among which the one best matching published clustering was picked and manual annotation was undertaken using marker genes. Results : Key genes for SARS-CoV-2 host cell entry are significantly lower expressed in human retinal cell-types compared to choroid. In detail, we observe no expression of ACE2 or TMPRSS2 in the retina, but a scarce co-expression in vessel associated cell-types of the choroid. No differences could be detected between fovea and periphery for both tissues. Conclusions : Key conclusion: The human retina is not vulnerable for a direct SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thus, retinal lesions as described in a recent Lancet publication by Marinho et al. are most likely due to a secondary damage (Marinho et al., 2020). However, SARS-CoV-2 entry genes are expressed in vessel-associated cell-types of the choroid. Thus, as described in other organs, the virus might infect the vasculature in terms of an infectious endothelitis, and could subsequently lead to vascular occlusions. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether vascular occlusions of the posterior eye segment correlate with life-threatening cardiovascular complications in COVID-19 patients. Thus, the posterior eye segment might qualify as an in vivo biomarker of systemic vascular disease in COVID-19 patients and imaging techniques of the posterior eye segment could be helpful for manage treatment of COVID-19 patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceSame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207