S’écrire et écrire sur l’Antiquité. L’apport des correspondances à l’histoire des travaux scientifiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SOMMAIRE- Le miroir des correspondances / Christian Jacob- Cicéron fondateur du genre de la correspondance scientifique ? / Carlos Lévy- Cum libris veteribus amicis : culture classique et démarche archéologique chez Busbecq / Laurent Grailet- La vraie première édition des fragments florentins des Hellenica Oxyrhynchia / Luciano Canfora- Karl Benedikt Hase (1780-1864) et Désiré Raoul-Rochette (1789-1854) D’après leur correspondance : deux médiateurs culturels entre France et Allemagne à la Bibliothèque nationale (1801-1864) / Ève Gran-Aymerich- Amicizia e storiografia nel carteggio Beloch-Meyer / Leandro Polverini- Le triumvirat scientifique. Mommsen, Harnack et Wilamowitz / Stefan Rebenich- L’Histoire de l’hellénisme de Johann Gustav Droysen à travers sa correspondance : entre science et prussianisme / Pascal Payen- La correspondance entre Georg Wissowa et Theodor Mommsen (1883-1901) / John Scheid & Eckhard Wirbelauer- Ad majorem scientiae fructum. Le Corpus inscriptionum semiticarum dans les correspondances conservées à l’Institut de France / Françoise Briquel-Chatonnet & Catherine Fauveaud-Brassaud- Die deutsch-französische Zusammenarbeit bei der Edition der Inschriften von Delos / Jürgen von Ungern-Sternberg- Émile Espérandieu et le Recueil des bas-reliefs de la Gaule : l’éclairage apporté par la correspondance / Éric Morvillez- La difficile structure de FGrHist. F. Jacoby et E. Meyer s’écrivent. À propos d’un plan inédit de 1915 / Guido Schepens & Jan Bollansée- Felix Jacoby aux prises avec ses critiques : lettres, comptes rendus et scholia Jacobiana / Antonio Luis Chávez Reino- Échos à la réception des Textes et monuments figurés relatifs aux Mystères de Mithra dans la correspondance de Franz Cumont / Corinne Bonnet & Véronique Krings- La correspondance archéologique du sous-lieutenant Émile Espérandieu en Tunisie (1882-1883) : naissance d’une carrière / Marianne Altit- Pedro Bosch Gimpera y la Escuela Arqueológica de Barcelona (1916-1939) a partir de las fuentes documentales de correspondencia / Francisco Gracia Alonso- La Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World nel carteggio Cumont-Rostovtzeff / Arnaldo Marcone- Salomon Reinach et Charles Tissot : naissance de l’Afrique romaine / Hervé Duchêne- Conclusions / Hinnerk Bruhns
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".