Migrantes latinoamericanos. Reserva laboral trasnacional del capitalismo de libre comercio en América del Norte y la Unión Europea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Latin-American immigrants. Capitalism free of trade in North America and the European Union’s labour transnational reserve. Within the new international work division, immigrant workers and the Mexican, Central American and Caribbean maquila industry workers are an essential part for the north American labour market and for the labour reserve of the north American and Canadian capitals because of its low cost which makes this work force be a competitive and comparative advantage in the regional level (NAFTA) in order to face up other geoeconomical blocks (UE y ASEAN) in the fight for the global markets. In turn, the south American immigrant labour force has become an important part of the transnational labour reserve of the north American capitalism but has become more important mostly in the European Union and in to a lesser extent, in Japan. In order to have a greater control of these workers and to maintain the migratory flows regulated, the United States and in a certain extent some countries of the European Union, have established mechanisms to make their immigration politics regional. The workers, in turn, have begun to organize themselves in a transnational way in order to defend their labour, political and social rights. KEY WORDS: immigration, labour reserve, transnational organization, labour market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".