MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

QS5: The Effect of Stem Cells and Local Tacrolimus on Neurite Extension

2021· article· en· W3184538026 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Saffari, Tiam M. Saffari, Gregory H. Borschel, Alexander Y. Shin

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecellularizationNeuriteMesenchymal stem cellRegeneration (biology)MedicineCD90Dorsal root ganglionTransplantationCryopreservationStem cellPathologyScaffoldIn vitroAnatomySurgeryChemistryBiomedical engineeringCD34Cell biologyDorsumBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or tacrolimus (FK506), an FDA approved immunosuppressant, to nerve grafts has been a topic of interest to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. The aim of this study was to investigate the combined effect of MSCs and local delivery of FK506 on nerve regeneration when applied to nerve autografts and decellularized nerve allografts. Methods: A three-dimensional (3D) in vitro compartmented cell culture system, validated by Tajdaran et al (2019), consisted of rat neonatal dorsal root ganglion (DRG) adjacent to rat nerve autograft or decellularized allograft. This model was used to evaluate regenerating neurites from the DRG into the peripheral nerve scaffold. Nerve autografts and decellularized allografts were augmented with (i) dynamic undifferentiated MSC seeding, (ii) local application of FK506 (100 ng/mL) or (iii) both (N=9/group). Local application was ensured by isolating the central system (i.e. DRG side) from the peripheral system (i.e. nerve graft side), where treatment was applied. After 48-hours of incubation, DRG-nerve graft constructs were collected, fixed, sectioned and stained against neurofilament-160 to measure neurite extension. CD90 staining was used to confirm stem cell characterization. Results: All grafts treated with MSCs confirmed CD90 expression. Compared to untreated autografts, neurite extension in autografts treated with FK506 and autografts treated with MSCs and FK506 combined were found superior (P<0.001 and P=0.0001, respectively), and comparable to autografts treated with MSCs (P=0.12). Compared to untreated allografts, allografts treated with FK506, and allografts treated with MSCs and FK506 were found superior (P<0.001 and P=0.0001, respectively), and allografts treated with MSCs were found comparable (P=0.09). All autograft groups were found superior compared to their respective allograft treatment group (P<0.05). Solely allografts receiving combined treatment were found superior to untreated autografts (P<0.05). Conclusion: MSCs or FK506 treatment improved neurite outgrowth and when combined, this resulted in significant synergistic neurite extension in both autografts and allografts in comparable patterns. Schematic overview of 3D compartmented cell culture system for isolated evaluation of treatment with MSCs and local FK506 in vitro. A 3.5 mm autograft or allograft with or without undifferentiated MSC seeding is attached to a DRG. DRG-nerve graft constructs are placed through a silicone isolator in the middle of a 24-wells plate to isolate the DRG from the nerve graft. FK506 containing media was added to the nerve graft side.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207