Migrations and Borders: Contributions to Understand Mobility in Cross-border Areas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work is the result of two research projects designed to present a more precise definition of population movements in border areas. To that end, they include a review of topics such as migration, borders, transnationalism and the mobility paradigm. In this analysis, we verify the central role that the notion of migration has played in studies of international and border displacements and highlight the need to propose a more precise definition. Thus, based on the notion of social practices – of different types – coined by Abelardo Morales (2010. Desentrañando Fronteras Y Sus Movimientos Transnacionales Entre Pequeños Estados. Una Aproximación Desde La Frontera Nicaragua-Costa Rica. In Migraciones Y Frontera. Nuevos Contornos Para La Movilidad Internacional, ed. M.E. Anguiano, and A.M. López, 185–224. Barcelona: Icaria), we define these practices as cross-border insofar as they involve two or more national states, which give rise to a series of adjectival mobilities. These can be formal or informal and for different reasons, i.e. healthcare, leisure, trade or work, among others. Likewise, we verify that both cross-border social practices and adjectival mobilities are factors that generate cross-border mobilities in border areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".