MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184873136 · doi:10.1111/nep.13951

Cardiorespiratory fitness assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing between different stages of pre‐dialysis chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021· review· en· W3184873136 on OpenAlex
Maria Eleni Alexandrou, Marieta Theodorakopoulou, Afroditi Boutou, Eva Pella, Aristi Boulmpou, Christodoulos Papadopoulos, Andreas Zafeiridis, Αikaterini Papagianni, Pantelis Sarafidis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiorespiratory fitnessDialysisKidney diseaseMeta-analysisVO2 maxInternal medicineRespiratory exchange ratioPhysical therapyRenal functionExercise intoleranceIntensive care medicineCardiologyHeart failureHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Aim The burden of several cardiovascular risk factors increases in parallel to renal function decline. Exercise intolerance is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and has been associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. Whether indices of cardiorespiratory capacity deteriorate with advancing CKD stages is unknown. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies assessing cardiorespiratory capacity in adult patients with pre‐dialysis CKD using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and reporting data for different stages. Our primary outcome was differences in peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 peak) between patients with CKD Stages 2–3a and those with Stages 3b–5(pre‐dialysis). Literature search was undertaken in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases, and abstract books of relevant meetings. Quality assessment was undertaken with Newcastle‐Ottawa‐Scale. Results From 4944 records initially retrieved, six studies with 512 participants fulfilling our inclusion criteria were included in the primary meta‐analysis. Peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 peak) was significantly higher in patients with CKD Stages 2–3a versus those with Stages 3b–5(pre‐dialysis) [weighted‐mean‐difference, WMD: 2.46, 95% CI (1.15, 3.78)]. Oxygen consumption at ventilatory threshold (VO 2 VT) was higher in Stages 2–3a compared with those in Stages 3b–5(pre‐dialysis) [standardized‐mean‐difference, SMD: 0.59, 95% CI (0.06, 1.1)], while no differences were observed for maximum workload and respiratory‐exchange‐ratio. A secondary analysis comparing patients with CKD Stages 2–3b and Stages 4–5(pre‐dialysis), yielded similar results [WMD: 1.78, 95% CI (1.34, 2.22)]. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings. Conclusion VO 2 peak and VO 2 VT assessed with CPET are significantly lower in patients in CKD Stages 3b–5 compared with Stages 2–3a. Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness may be another factor contributing to cardiovascular risk increase with advancing CKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0250.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it