Quantitative Analysis of EEG Slow Wave Activity Based on MinPeakProminence Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Persistent, unchanging, and non-reactive focal or generalized abnormal Slow Wave (SW) activities in an awake adult patient are examined pathologically. Although these waves in Electroencephalogram (EEG) are much less prominent than transient activities in some areas, it is not possible to understand them easily by looking at the EEG. For this reason, reliable computer programs that can sort out Slow Waves (SWs) correctly are needed. In this study, a new method based on MinPeakProminence that can detect abnormal SW activities was developed. To test the performance of the study, the data collected from Selcuk University Hospital (22 subjects - epilepsy and various neurological diseases) and Bonn Hospital (only normal A dataset) were used. Various statistical performance measurement methods were used to search the results. The results of this analysis revealed that the classification success, sensitivity and specificity values obtained with the SUH dataset were 96.5%, 93.3% and 96.1%, respectively. In the results of the experiments made with the Bonn dataset, 100% classification success was achieved. Besides, according to the analyses, it was found that SWs are frequently seen in the posterior regions of the brain, especially in the parietal and occipital regions in the SUH dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".