MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184944493 · doi:10.4000/insitu.32580

La reconstruction du lycée Le Verrier de Saint-Lô (Manche), 1944-1956

2021· article· fr· W3184944493 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Blaizeau

Bibliographic record

VenueIn Situ · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSAINTEthnologyArt historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le collège municipal de Saint-Lô (Manche), largement détruit par les bombardements de la ville en 1944, fut reconstruit entre 1948 et 1955 par Pierre Duprat (1919-2002) et Michel Pinget (1911-1987). Devenu mixte en 1953, transformé en lycée en 1955, il prit alors le nom de l’astronome saint-lois Urbain Le Verrier. Évolutions institutionnelles et architecturales se conjuguent donc au cours de la période de la Reconstruction afin d’offrir aux élèves un établissement modernisé, confortable et conforme aux prescriptions les plus récentes du ministère de l’Éducation nationale.Le cas de Saint-Lô illustre aussi les ambitions, les réussites et les limites de la Seconde Reconstruction. Le nouveau lycée devait contribuer au renouveau urbanistique de Saint-Lô. Il s’inscrit finalement en partie dans les pas de l’établissement qui existait avant-guerre (localisation, disposition générale héritée du XIXe siècle), pour des raisons avant tout économiques. Mais les aléas du chantier et l’évolution des normes ont alourdi la facture et grevé pour longtemps les finances communales. L’établissement fut néanmoins jugé très réussi, à l’instar d’un programme décoratif unique dans le paysage saint-lois, qui associe sculptures et mosaïques, notamment un Planétarium (1957-1958) de Robert Couturier (1905-2008) aujourd’hui déposé au musée d’Art et d’Histoire de Saint-Lô.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIn SituSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207