MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184965706 · doi:10.22215/etd/2021-14575

Transcriptional Regulators of Suberin Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana

2021· dissertation· en· W3184965706 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy M. Garant

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Surface Properties and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuberinEndodermisArabidopsisSteleArabidopsis thalianaTranscription factorPromoterBiologyTranscription (linguistics)GeneCell biologyBiochemistryGene expressionBotanyCell wallMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Like all vascular plants, the root endodermis of Arabidopsis thaliana contains aliphatic suberin, a cell wall-associated hydrophobic polymer that helps direct the symplastic movement of water and solutes into the central vasculature.The enzymes involved in suberin biosynthesis are relatively well characterized, but there are many gaps in our knowledge on how suberin biosynthesis is regulated.In this study, I demonstrate that Arabidopsis MYB41, MYB53, MYB92, and MYB93, which are R2R3 MYBtype transcription factors, can activate the transcription of suberin biosynthesis genes through their promoter (region 5' of the translation start site).Using a promoter: reporter deletion series, two regions of the promoter upstream region of the Arabidopsis FAR4 gene, which encodes a suberin biosynthetic enzyme, were determined to be important for specific expression in the root endodermis.AC-rich motifs, which are important for the recognition of DNA by specific MYB-type transcription factors, were enriched in the promoters of suberin biosynthesis genes.Although the important FAR4 promoter DNA segments contained these AC-rich motifs, I found no evidence of direct binding by MYB53, MYB92, and MYB93 using a yeast 1-hybrid assay.Lastly, the promoter of Arabidopsis WRKY56, which also encodes a transcription factor, was transcriptionally activated by MYB41, MYB53, MYB92, and MYB93.While WRKY56 had limited impact on root suberin deposition under non-stress conditions, bioinformatic evidence suggests that WRKY56 has a role under stress conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant Surface Properties and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207