MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Soil moisture map construction by sequential data assimilation using an extended Kalman filter

2021· article· en· W3185042836 on OpenAlexafffund
Bernard T. Agyeman, Bo Song, Soumya Ranjan Sahoo, Xunyuan Yin, Jinfeng Liu, Sirish L. Shah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsKalman filterWater contentSensor fusionData assimilationFusion centerComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceUsabilityRemote sensingIrrigationSoil scienceAgricultural engineeringEngineeringComputer visionMeteorologyGeotechnical engineeringArtificial intelligenceGeographyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microwave remote sensors mounted on center pivot irrigation systems provide a feasible approach to obtain soil moisture information, in the form of water content maps, for the implementation of closed-loop irrigation. However, major challenges such as time delays in the measurements, the inability of the sensors to provide soil moisture information in instances where the center pivot is stationary, and the inability of the sensors to provide soil moisture information in the root zone reduce the usability of the water content maps in the implementation of closed-loop irrigation. In this work, we propose an information fusion system which comprises of the cylindrical coordinates version of the Richards equation, the extended Kalman filter, and measurements from microwave sensors to address the aforementioned challenges. The utility of the proposed information fusion system is first investigated with simulated microwave sensor measurements. The information fusion system is then applied to a real large-scale agriculture field where we demonstrate its effectiveness and performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207