MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3185544879 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v16i2.71727

Siblings of an ℵ0-categorical relational structure

2021· article· en· W3185544879 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Claude Laflamme, Maurice Pouzet, Norbert Sauer, Robert Woodrow

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topology and Set Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBanff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and DiscoveryUniversité de LyonAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsCountable setMathematicsIsomorphism (crystallography)CombinatoricsCategorical variableDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sibling of a relational structure $R$ is any structure $S$ which can be embedded into $R$ and, vice versa, such that $R$ can be embedded into $S$. Let $\operatorname{sib}(R)$ be the number of siblings of $R$, these siblings being counted up to isomorphism. Thomassé conjectured that for countable relational structures made of at most countably many relations, $\operatorname{sib}(R)$ is either one, countably infinite, or the size of the continuum; but even showing the special case $\operatorname{sib}(R)1$ is one or infinite is unsettled when $R$ is a countable tree. We prove that if $R$ is countable and $\aleph_{0}$-categorical, then indeed $\operatorname{sib}(R)$ is one or infinite. Furthermore, $\operatorname{sib}(R)$ is one if and only if $R$ is finitely partitionable in the sense of Hodkinson and Macpherson [14]. The key tools in our proof are the notion of monomorphic decomposition of a relational structure introduced in [35] and studied further in [23], [24], and a result of Frasnay [11].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Topology and Set TheoryFrench-language works237,207