MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3185625537 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.160307

Investigation of the Efficiency of Small-Scale NF/RO Seawater Desalination by Using Artificial Neural Network Modeling

2021· article· en· W3185625537 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Asma Adda, Salah Bezari, Mohamed Salmi, Giulio Lorenzini, Maamar Laidi, Salah Hanini, Rachid Maouedj, Younes Menni, Houari Ameur, Hijaz Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesalinationSeawaterArtificial neural networkVolumetric flow rateLinear regressionPermeationEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceMathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceStatisticsComputer scienceChemistryGeologyMembraneThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An attempt is conducted in this paper to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) model for predicting the efficiency of small-scale NF/RO seawater desalination, then applied to the simulation of permeate flow rate and water recovery. A feed-forward back-propagation neural network with the Levenberg-Marquardt learning algorithm is considered. The performance of ANN compared to the multiple linear regression (MLR) is based on the calculated value of the coefficient of determination (R2). For ANN, R2 permeate flow rate was 0.997, and R2 permeate water recovery was 0.999, and for MLR, R2 permeate flow rate was 0.508, and R2 permeate water recovery was 0.713. It was observed that ANN performed better than the MLR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207