MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3185852380

Fear associated with COVID-19 in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients

2021· article· en· W3185852380 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean-Philippe Rozon, Mélanie Hébert, Serge Bourgault, Mathieu Caissie, Laurence Letartre, Éric Tourville, Ali Dirani

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicinePandemicFeelingMacular degenerationOrdinal regressionMultivariate analysisSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)DemographyOphthalmologyPsychologyInternal medicineDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose : Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, news related to the pandemic have created a feeling of fear, particularly among high-risk groups including elderly patients. We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study to assess the fear associated with COVID-19 and the fear of vision decrease related to the delay of treatment inneovascular age related macular degeneration patients (nAMD) during the pandemic. Methods : 160 actively treated nAMD patients were enrolled between September to November 2020 in a tertiary university hospital in Quebec, Canada. Exclusion criteria included: patients with memory disorders and patients with incomplete questionnaire. For each participant, demographic and clinical data were collected. The fear was rated in a questionnaire composed of two sections: the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) and eight additional questions to assess ophthalmology-related COVID-19 statements. A multivariate linear regression model was built for FCV-19S score and a multivariable ordinal regression model for ophthalmology-related statements. Results : The mean level of FCV-19S was 17.05±4.38. In the multivariate analysis, it was significantly higher in women (p<0.001) and patients with elementary school level (compared to high school education level) (p=0.009). In the ophthalmology-related statements, 16% of patients feared vision loss because of difficulties in maintaining regular follow-ups during the pandemic. The female gender was significantly associated with a higher tendency to postpone their appointment (p=0.03) and to prefer “sacrificing” their vision to avoid contracting COVID-19 (p=0.05). No association was found between the patients' underlying nAMD characteristics (visual acuity, bilaterality, duration) and higher fear of vision loss. Conclusions : Despite the massive impact the pandemic has had on our functioning in most aspects of life, the anxiety related to COVID-19 and delaying ophthalmology treatments remained relatively low in nAMD patients. Greater explanations to address this fear may reduce anxiety level, especially among female patients and those with an elementary school education level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceSame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207