Empirical modelling of vitamin B12 duodenal flow in lactating dairy cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unlike other B vitamins, vitamin B12 is not found in plants and is produced only by bacteria. Therefore, supply to the dairy cow, unless provided via supplementation, will mainly be the result of B12 manufactured by ruminal microbes. The duodenal flow of B vitamins therefore represents the amount of vitamin available for absorption by the ruminant, which can be used for essential metabolic functions and milk production. However, diet composition may affect ruminal synthesis and the resulting duodenal flow (DF) of vitamin B12, due to alterations to fermentation and ruminal conditions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis describing how diet composition affects DF of vitamin B12. Data were collected from 340 individual lactating cows involved in 16 published studies. Saved diet and duodenal samples from these studies were subsequently reanalyzed for B vitamin content to create the database used in the present study. Potential driving variables considered included (DM basis) dietary organic matter (%), NDF (%), starch (%), crude protein (%) and DMI (kg/d). The meta-analysis was conducted in 3 steps, followed by statistical evaluation of the resulting empirical models. A Spearman correlation matrix was constructed between all potential driving variables to assess for collinearity between X variables, and guide model creation. Then, using Cook's distance statistic (Proc MIXED), outliers were determined and removed. Finally, a suite of potential models (with study treated as a random effect) were developed in GLIMMIX. Where models were statistically significant, evaluation was completed using root mean square prediction error (RMSPE) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) to determine the sources of error. The best performing model was: B12DF (mg/d) = −7.87 (�2.46) + 0.29 (�0.056) � DietNDF(%) + 0.44 (�0.042) � DMI (kg/d); RMSPE: 41.1%, CCC: 0.268. In conclusion, DF of B12 was positively impacted by both the overall DMI and the dietary NDF content of the diet. This information may be used to better understand supply of vitamin B12 to the modern dairy cow, in relation to requirements, to improve milk production efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".