Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bill 12 recognizes and supports the implementation of the community school philosophy and model in Manitoba.This philosophy endorses and promotes the essential role of schools in the community, while the model facilitates the development of services, programs, and activities to support students, families, and the local community.The Community Schools Program is established with the purpose of assisting the public school system with improving the social, emotional, and physical health and well-being of students in socio-economically disadvantaged communities across Manitoba.The goal is to prepare students to engage in the learning process every day and take full advantage of educational opportunities available to them. 2 As part of the Program, participating community schools will be assigned an employee of the school division or district to act as community liaison and coordinate programming within the school.The Community Schools Unit is within the Department of Education to assist and support community schools and maintain a network of such schools in Manitoba.Further, the Bill highlights funding and reporting requirements and establishes an advisory committee and a committee of deputy ministers. 3 The deputy ministers' committee is responsible for ensuring that government departments involved in community education work collaboratively using a cross-departmental approach. 4 Finally, the Minister is delegated the responsibility of making the regulations for the Act. 5 Manitoba introduced this legislation to 2 The Community Schools Act, SM 2013, c 29, CCSM c C168, s 2-5 [The Act].3
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".