MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3185991296

変形性股関節症~ 病態,リスクファクター,治療の最新知見~

2021· article· ja· W3185991296 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
池 裕之, ほか

Bibliographic record

VenuePharma Medica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

従来は「軟骨の変性・摩耗による非炎症性疾患」と考えられていた変形性関節症だが,新たな知見の集積によって病態解明が進み,現在では軟骨だけでなく骨,靱帯,滑膜,筋肉,神経が発症から進行まで複雑に関与する“wholejoint disease”として捉えられ,その発症および進行に炎症が関与していることが明らかになっている1)。 変形性股関節症の発症のリスクファクターとして肥満,身体活動性,股関節形態,遺伝的要因,骨密度が,進行のリスクファクターとして年齢,肥満,股関節形態があり,発症と進行を抑えるためには体重管理と外傷の予防が重要である。近年の海外のガイドラインでは,症状緩和と機能改善に対する治療として,運動や理学療法に加えて患者教育が重要視されており,薬物療法では経口非ステロイド性抗炎症薬(non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs:NSAIDs)とステロイド関節内注射が推奨されている。手術療法では,人工股関節全置換術(total hiparthroplasty:THA)におけるロボット支援手術が普及し始めている。 本稿では,変形性股関節症の病態,リスクファクター,治療に関する最新知見について紹介する。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharma MedicaSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207