MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186053864 · doi:10.1007/s00415-021-10711-6

Cerebrospinal fluid metallomics in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: an exploratory analysis

2021· article· en· W3186053864 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gargi Banerjee, Niklas Forsgard, Gareth Ambler, Ashvini Keshavan, Ross W. Paterson, Martha Foiani, Jamie Toombs, Amanda Heslegrave, Edward J. Thompson, Michael P. Lunn, Nick C. Fox, Henrik Zetterberg, Jonathan M. Schott, David J. Werring

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilUCLH Biomedical Research CentreVetenskapsrådetAlzheimer’s Research UKWolfson FoundationStroke AssociationRosetrees TrustUniversity College LondonNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBrain Research UKAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationWeston Brain InstituteAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsCerebral amyloid angiopathyCerebrospinal fluidFerritinMedicineInternal medicineNeurologyAlzheimer's diseaseGastroenterologyTransferrinNeuroradiologyBiomarkerPathologyDiseaseChemistryDementiaBiochemistryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is associated with symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage. Biomarkers of clinically silent bleeding events, such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ferritin and iron, might provide novel measures of disease presence and severity. METHODS: We performed an exploratory study comparing CSF iron, ferritin, and other metal levels in patients with CAA, control subjects (CS) and patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Ferritin was measured using a latex fixation test; metal analyses were performed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. RESULTS: CAA patients (n = 10) had higher levels of CSF iron than the AD (n = 20) and CS (n = 10) groups (medians 23.42, 15.48 and 17.71 μg/L, respectively, p = 0.0015); the difference between CAA and AD groups was significant in unadjusted and age-adjusted analyses. We observed a difference in CSF ferritin (medians 10.10, 7.77 and 8.01 ng/ml, for CAA, AD and CS groups, respectively, p = 0.01); the difference between the CAA and AD groups was significant in unadjusted, but not age-adjusted, analyses. We also observed differences between the CAA and AD groups in CSF nickel and cobalt (unadjusted analyses). CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, we provide preliminary evidence for a distinct CSF metallomic profile in patients with CAA. Replication and validation of these results in larger cohorts is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurologySame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207