The physical examination is unreliable in determining the location of the distal fibular physis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Salter-Harris type 1 (SH1) fractures of the distal fibula are acute orthopedic injuries with tenderness over the physis without radiographic evidence of fracture. Our primary objective was to establish the accuracy of the physical examination performed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians in determining the location of the distal fibular physis compared to a criterion standard of ultrasound. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study at an urban academic pediatric emergency department of a convenience sample of children aged 4 to 10 years old between March 2019 and March 2020. A PEM physician or fellow examined the patient's distal fibula and marked the location of the physis with a marker. A study investigator scanned the distal fibula to establish the location of the physis on ultrasound and measured the distance between the clinician's estimated position and the actual sonographic position. We a priori defined a clinically accurate position as a distance of ≤5 mm. We compared the accuracy rate of physical examination to ultrasound landmarking using proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We enrolled 71 patients, of whom 52 (73%) were male. The mean age was 6.7 years and the mean weight was 25.5 kg. Participating PEM physicians included 18 attending physicians and 2 fellows. The distal fibular physis was correctly identified in 24 patients, yielding an accuracy rate of 34% (95% CI 23%-46%). The mean distance between the physician's estimated position and the sonographic position was 7.4 mm (95% CI 6.4-8.4 mm). CONCLUSIONS: PEM physicians were unable to accurately identify the distal fibular physis on physical examination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.054 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".