A mathematical model and a method to measure the instantaneous power output of vehicular driving wheels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The internal resistance of a dynamometer is regarded as a constant force when using traditional test methods, which means that the measurement values for the instantaneous power output of the vehicle driving wheel are underestimated. In this study, we aimed to resolve this issue. Thus, we constructed a system for measuring drum movement and propose a method for measuring the instantaneous power output of a vehicle’s driving wheel. Further, we created a mathematical model of the instantaneous power output from a vehicle’s driving wheel. Comparing the results from our model with our experimental results, we found that the actual power output of the driving wheel was reflected more accurately by our proposed method, and that the accuracy of the measurement results was not affected by the vehicle’s speed. The output torque of the vehicle’s driving wheel calculated using our proposed model was closer to the running resistance of the vehicle. Thus, our model facilitates accurate no-dismounting, rapid measurement of the power output of a driving wheel, and accurate simulation of road running resistance using a dynamometer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".